You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ecological consequences of neonicotinoid mixtures in streams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.abj8182 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Travis S. Schmidt, Janet L. Miller, Barbara J. Mahler, Peter C. Van Metre, Lisa H. Nowell, Mark W. Sandstrom, Daren M. Carlisle, Patrick W. Moran, Paul M. Bradley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Guernsey | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 23% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,172,001
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#10,117
of 12,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,930
of 447,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#435
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.