You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
絶滅危惧種シマフクロウを対象とした写真撮影者の特性および観光利用における問題点
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.18960/hozen.2036 |
Authors |
早矢仕 有子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 687 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 170 | 25% |
Korea, Republic of | 3 | <1% |
China | 2 | <1% |
Austria | 2 | <1% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Haiti | 1 | <1% |
Nepal | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 500 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 683 | 99% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Scientists | 2 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 426. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#69,341
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#1
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,383
of 359,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.