You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
訪問リハビリテーションに従事する作業療法士が対象者の活動・参加レベルの目標達成を支援するプロセス ─複線径路等至性アプローチ(TEA)による分析の試み─
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Occupational Therapy Research, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.32178/jotr.41.2_226 |
| Authors |
齋藤 佑樹, 友利 幸之介, 澤田 辰徳, 大野 勘太 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 36% |
| Unknown | 18 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,619,055
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Occupational Therapy Research
#4
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,093
of 450,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Occupational Therapy Research
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.