| Title |
Association between primary care contacts, continuity of care and identification of palliative care needs with hospital utilization among people dying with dementia: a population-based cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0715 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Javiera Leniz, Martin Gulliford, Irene J Higginson, Sabrina Bajwah, Deokhee Yi, Wei Gao, Katherine E Sleeman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 40% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 30% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,336,097
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#625
of 4,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,295
of 438,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#15
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.