↓ Skip to main content

Deirdre Nansen McCloskey, Bettering Humanomics: A New, and Old, Approach to Economic Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021), pp. 144, $30 (hardcover). ISBN: 9780226765921.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the History of Economic Thought, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deirdre Nansen McCloskey, Bettering Humanomics: A New, and Old, Approach to Economic Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021), pp. 144, $30 (hardcover). ISBN: 9780226765921.
Published in
Journal of the History of Economic Thought, April 2022
DOI 10.1017/s1053837222000013
Authors

Maria Pia Paganelli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,614,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#244
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,729
of 447,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.