↓ Skip to main content

地下水経由の栄養素およびミネラルの人為負荷がプアフェンのワラミズゴケハンモックの分布に与える影響

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology and Civil Engineering, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
地下水経由の栄養素およびミネラルの人為負荷がプアフェンのワラミズゴケハンモックの分布に与える影響
Published in
Ecology and Civil Engineering, April 2022
DOI 10.3825/ece.21-00015
Authors

佐藤 奏衣, 矢部 和夫, 木塚 俊和, 矢崎 友嗣

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#51
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,940
of 448,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.