↓ Skip to main content

道路擁壁及び河川護岸における石積みの破壊形態について

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D2 (Historical Studies in Civil Engineering), January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
道路擁壁及び河川護岸における石積みの破壊形態について
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D2 (Historical Studies in Civil Engineering), January 2022
DOI 10.2208/jscejhsce.78.1_11
Authors

三山 幹木, 真田 純子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,532,577
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D2 (Historical Studies in Civil Engineering)
#16
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,033
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D2 (Historical Studies in Civil Engineering)
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.