↓ Skip to main content

An initial waitlist-controlled trial of the unified protocol for the treatment of emotional disorders in adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anxiety Disorders, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An initial waitlist-controlled trial of the unified protocol for the treatment of emotional disorders in adolescents
Published in
Journal of Anxiety Disorders, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A substantial proportion of adolescents are non-responders to well-established treatments for anxiety and depression, and many existent approaches do not adequately address comorbidity. There is a need to develop and evaluate unified treatments for adolescents that flexibly address higher order factors shared among internalizing or emotional disorders. The Unified Protocol for the Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents (UP-A) is a transdiagnostic treatment that targets shared vulnerability and maintenance factors in a flexible format. This study examined initial outcomes of a randomized, waitlist-controlled trial of the UP-A. The UP-A outperformed waitlist at mid-treatment with respect to disorder severity and functional impairment, and there was a significant treatment effect in favor of the UP-A on all outcome measures at post-treatment. Within-subjects analyses collapsing across participants revealed significant improvements on outcome measures over time. Results support further study of the UP-A and its potential efficacy in treating adolescent anxiety and depression.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 243 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 11%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 90 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 95 39%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 103 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anxiety Disorders
#1,495
of 1,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,764
of 323,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anxiety Disorders
#30
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.