You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
満洲語の多様な形態素-nggeの文法的位置付け
|
---|---|
Published in |
GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan), May 2016
|
DOI | 10.11435/gengo.148.0_33 |
Authors |
早田 輝洋 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Taiwan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,529,394
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan)
#81
of 180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,298
of 312,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan)
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.