↓ Skip to main content

競技場面における試合での失敗体験から次の試合に至るまでの思考プロセスの質的検討 ―メタ認知療法の観点から―

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Sport Psychology, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
競技場面における試合での失敗体験から次の試合に至るまでの思考プロセスの質的検討 ―メタ認知療法の観点から―
Published in
Japanese Journal of Sport Psychology, September 2022
DOI 10.4146/jjspopsy.2022-2102
Authors

梅津 千佳, 富田 望, 南出 歩美, 武井 友紀, 朴木 優斗, 熊野 宏昭

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#14,515,962
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Sport Psychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,572
of 427,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Sport Psychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them