↓ Skip to main content

Anterior eye tissue morphology: Scleral and conjunctival thickness in children and young adults

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anterior eye tissue morphology: Scleral and conjunctival thickness in children and young adults
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep33796
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott A. Read, David Alonso-Caneiro, Stephen J. Vincent, Alexander Bremner, Annabel Fothergill, Brittney Ismail, Rebecca McGraw, Charlotte J. Quirk, Elspeth Wrigley

Abstract

The sclera and conjunctiva form part of the eye's tough, protective outer coat, and play important roles in the eye's mechanical protection and immune defence, as well as in determining the size and shape of the eye globe. Advances in ocular imaging technology now allow these tissues in the anterior eye to be imaged non-invasively and with high resolution, however there is a paucity of data examining the dimensions of these tissues in paediatric populations. In this study, we have used optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging to examine the normal in vivo thickness profile of the anterior sclera and overlying conjunctiva in 111 healthy young participants, including a large proportion of paediatric subjects. We demonstrate that the thickness of the anterior sclera varies significantly with measurement location and meridian. Tissue thickness also varied significantly with age, with younger subjects exhibiting significantly thinner scleras and significantly greater conjunctival thickness. Males were also found to exhibit significantly greater scleral thickness. Refractive error however was not significantly associated with either scleral or conjunctival thickness in this population. These findings provide new data describing the normative dimensions of anterior eye tissues in children and the factors that can influence these dimensions in young populations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 34 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 37 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2026.
All research outputs
#5,950,923
of 23,880,375 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#40,409
of 129,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,374
of 324,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,186
of 3,525 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,880,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,525 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.