You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
コシアブラ樹体内における福島第一原子力発電所事故由来137Cs分布と葉の高濃度化の要因について
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Forest Society, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.4005/jjfs.103.192 |
| Authors |
Hideki Ogawa, Satoshi Sakurai, Norihiro Teshirogi, Hirohisa Yoshida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,556,882
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Forest Society
#57
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,662
of 462,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Forest Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them