↓ Skip to main content

Absorption Spectroscopy of an Individual Fano Cluster

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Letters, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Absorption Spectroscopy of an Individual Fano Cluster
Published in
Nano Letters, October 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03080
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Plasmonic clusters can exhibit Fano resonances with unique and tunable asymmetric lineshapes, which arise due to the coupling of bright and dark plasmon modes within each multi-particle structure. These structures are capable of generating remarkably large local electromagnetic field enhancements, and should give rise to high hot carrier yields relative to other plasmonic nanostructures. While the scattering properties of individual plasmonic Fano resonances have been characterized extensively both experimentally and theoretically, their absorption properties, critical for hot carrier generation, have not yet been measured. Here, we utilize single particle absorption spectroscopy based on photothermal imaging to distinguish between the radiative and non-radiative properties of an individual Fano cluster. In observing the absorption spectrum of individual Fano clusters, we directly verify the theoretical prediction that while Fano interference may be prominent in scattering, it is completely absent in absorption. Our results provide microscopic insight into the nature of Fano interference in systems of coupled plasmonic nanoparticles, and should pave the way for the optimization of hot carrier production using plasmonic Fano clusters.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 43%
Researcher 12 13%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Master 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 29%
Physics and Astronomy 23 25%
Materials Science 11 12%
Engineering 11 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,549,040
of 32,509,418 outputs
Outputs from Nano Letters
#6,436
of 16,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,550
of 328,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Letters
#99
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,509,418 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.