↓ Skip to main content

La Machine: Obstetric Phantoms of Madame Du Coudray … Back to the Roots

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 344)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
La Machine: Obstetric Phantoms of Madame Du Coudray … Back to the Roots
Published in
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, April 2022
DOI 10.1177/23821205221090168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 16 67%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Design 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2026.
All research outputs
#2,089,912
of 32,692,245 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
#14
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,306
of 462,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,692,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.