You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Sustainability, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-022-00873-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Corey A. Krabbenhoft, George H. Allen, Peirong Lin, Sarah E. Godsey, Daniel C. Allen, Ryan M. Burrows, Amanda G. DelVecchia, Ken M. Fritz, Margaret Shanafield, Amy J. Burgin, Margaret A. Zimmer, Thibault Datry, Walter K. Dodds, C. Nathan Jones, Meryl C. Mims, Catherin Franklin, John C. Hammond, Sam Zipper, Adam S. Ward, Katie H. Costigan, Hylke E. Beck, Julian D. Olden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 27% |
| Australia | 7 | 5% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
| China | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 72 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 65 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#249,628
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Nature Sustainability
#241
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,160
of 448,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Sustainability
#8
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.