↓ Skip to main content

Convergence of pontine and proprioceptive streams onto multimodal cerebellar granule cells

Overview of attention for article published in eLife, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Convergence of pontine and proprioceptive streams onto multimodal cerebellar granule cells
Published in
eLife, February 2013
DOI 10.7554/elife.00400
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cerebellar granule cells constitute the majority of neurons in the brain and are the primary conveyors of sensory and motor-related mossy fiber information to Purkinje cells. The functional capability of the cerebellum hinges on whether individual granule cells receive mossy fiber inputs from multiple precerebellar nuclei or are instead unimodal; this distinction is unresolved. Using cell-type-specific projection mapping with synaptic resolution, we observed the convergence of separate sensory (upper body proprioceptive) and basilar pontine pathways onto individual granule cells and mapped this convergence across cerebellar cortex. These findings inform the long-standing debate about the multimodality of mammalian granule cells and substantiate their associative capacity predicted in the Marr-Albus theory of cerebellar function. We also provide evidence that the convergent basilar pontine pathways carry corollary discharges from upper body motor cortical areas. Such merging of related corollary and sensory streams is a critical component of circuit models of predictive motor control. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00400.001.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 8 2%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 321 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 28%
Researcher 79 23%
Student > Master 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Other 16 5%
Other 49 14%
Unknown 46 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 115 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 4%
Engineering 13 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 56 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,294,154
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#6,459
of 14,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,269
of 194,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#17
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.