↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY DETECTION OF BRUCH MEMBRANE AND CHORIOCAPILLARIS ABNORMALITIES IN SORSBY MACULAR DYSTROPHY
Published in
Retina, September 2022
DOI 10.1097/iae.0000000000003515
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) was used to analyze Bruch's membrane (BM) and choriocapillaris (CC) abnormalities in undiagnosed family members with Sorsby macular dystrophy (SMD). In a family with SMD (TIMP3 Tyr191Cys), SS-OCTA imaging was performed using the 6X6mm scan patter and previously validated algorithms to detect abnormalities in BM and the CC, as well as the presence of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) and macular neovascularization (MNV). Genetic analyses were performed for TIMP3 mutations. Of eight family members, two were previously diagnosed with SMD and six were asymptomatic. SS-OCTA imaging of the 33-year-old proband revealed type 1 MNV in the left eye and bilateral RPD, thickening of BM, CC thinning, and increases in CC flow deficits (FDs). A TIMP3 mutation was confirmed. His niece, despite having no clinical evidence of SMD, showed BM thickening and CC thinning on SS-OCTA. A TIMP3 mutation was confirmed. The proband's younger nephew and niece also carried the TIMP3 mutation without clinical evidence of SMD. Two additional members had normal exams, unremarkable SS-OCTA findings, and no TIMP3 mutation. SS-OCTA imaging can detect BM and CC abnormalities in vivo in subjects unaware of their TIMP3 status in a family with SMD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,282,133
of 29,526,682 outputs
Outputs from Retina
#1,584
of 4,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,566
of 442,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retina
#31
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,526,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.