You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An assessment of uncertainties in VS profiles obtained from microtremor observations in the phased 2018 COSMOS blind trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Seismology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10950-021-10059-4 |
| Authors |
Michael W. Asten, Alan Yong, Sebastiano Foti, Koichi Hayashi, Antony J. Martin, William J. Stephenson, John F. Cassidy, Jacie Coleman, Robert Nigbor, Silvia Castellaro, Kosuke Chimoto, Cécile Cornou, Ikuo Cho, Takumi Hayashida, Manuel Hobiger, Chun-Hsiang Kuo, Albert Macau, E. Diego Mercerat, Sheri Molnar, Passakorn Pananont, Marco Pilz, Nakhorn Poovarodom, Esteban Sáez, Marc Wathelet, Hiroaki Yamanaka, Toshiaki Yokoi, Don Zhao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 33% |
| Engineering | 2 | 17% |
| Design | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,687,628
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Seismology
#157
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,961
of 507,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Seismology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.