↓ Skip to main content

THE MADMAN AND THE ECONOMIST(S): GEORGES BATAILLE AND FRANÇOIS PERROUX AS FRENCH CRITIQUES OF THE MARSHALL PLAN

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the History of Economic Thought, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
THE MADMAN AND THE ECONOMIST(S): GEORGES BATAILLE AND FRANÇOIS PERROUX AS FRENCH CRITIQUES OF THE MARSHALL PLAN
Published in
Journal of the History of Economic Thought, April 2022
DOI 10.1017/s1053837221000225
Authors

Raphaël Fèvre

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,560,712
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#178
of 446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,127
of 447,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.