| Title |
Global population divergence and admixture of the brown rat (Rattus norvegicus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2016.1762 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily E. Puckett, Jane Park, Matthew Combs, Michael J. Blum, Juliet E. Bryant, Adalgisa Caccone, Federico Costa, Eva E. Deinum, Alexandra Esther, Chelsea G. Himsworth, Peter D. Keightley, Albert Ko, Åke Lundkvist, Lorraine M. McElhinney, Serge Morand, Judith Robins, James Russell, Tanja M. Strand, Olga Suarez, Lisa Yon, Jason Munshi-South |
| Abstract |
Native to China and Mongolia, the brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) now enjoys a worldwide distribution. While black rats and the house mouse tracked the regional development of human agricultural settlements, brown rats did not appear in Europe until the 1500s, suggesting their range expansion was a response to relatively recent increases in global trade. We inferred the global phylogeography of brown rats using 32 k SNPs, and detected 13 evolutionary clusters within five expansion routes. One cluster arose following a southward expansion into Southeast Asia. Three additional clusters arose from two independent eastward expansions: one expansion from Russia to the Aleutian Archipelago, and a second to western North America. Westward expansion resulted in the colonization of Europe from which subsequent rapid colonization of Africa, the Americas and Australasia occurred, and multiple evolutionary clusters were detected. An astonishing degree of fine-grained clustering between and within sampling sites underscored the extent to which urban heterogeneity shaped genetic structure of commensal rodents. Surprisingly, few individuals were recent migrants, suggesting that recruitment into established populations is limited. Understanding the global population structure of R. norvegicus offers novel perspectives on the forces driving the spread of zoonotic disease, and aids in development of rat eradication programmes. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 63% |
| Scientists | 12 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 282 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 15% |
| Unknown | 76 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 96 | 33% |