↓ Skip to main content

「運動部活動の効果研究」の批判的レビュー: 「性」はいかに扱われてきたのか?

Overview of attention for article published in Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences), January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「運動部活動の効果研究」の批判的レビュー: 「性」はいかに扱われてきたのか?
Published in
Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences), January 2022
DOI 10.5432/jjpehss.21146
Authors

三上 純

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#19,934,854
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)
#260
of 299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#367,642
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.