↓ Skip to main content

Planning for Active Living: Should We Support a New Moral Environmentalism?

Overview of attention for article published in Planning Theory & Practice, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Planning for Active Living: Should We Support a New Moral Environmentalism?
Published in
Planning Theory & Practice, February 2007
DOI 10.1080/14649350600673013
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Master 7 21%
Researcher 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 42%
Psychology 3 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#28,599,837
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Planning Theory & Practice
#433
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,454
of 131,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planning Theory & Practice
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.