↓ Skip to main content

Weak sinks could cradle mutualistic symbioses – strong sources should harbour parasitic symbioses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evolutionary Biology, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Weak sinks could cradle mutualistic symbioses – strong sources should harbour parasitic symbioses
Published in
Journal of Evolutionary Biology, March 2000
DOI 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00157.x
Authors

Hochberg, Gomulkiewicz, Holt, Thompson

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 5%
India 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 144 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Student > Master 15 9%
Professor 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 7%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 62%
Environmental Science 17 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Mathematics 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 23 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,364,695
of 24,996,701 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Biology
#1,488
of 2,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,284
of 40,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,996,701 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them