You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Major point and nonpoint sources of nutrient pollution to surface water have declined throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Communications, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1088/2515-7620/ac5db6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert D Sabo, Breck Sullivan, Cuiyin Wu, Emily Trentacoste, Qian Zhang, Gary W Shenk, Gopal Bhatt, Lewis C Linker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 55% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Librarian | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,614,407
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Communications
#88
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,036
of 442,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Communications
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.