You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fundamental Science and Engineering Questions in Planetary Cave Exploration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: PLANETS, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2022je007194 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Judson Wynne, Timothy N. Titus, Ali‐akbar Agha‐Mohammadi, Armando Azua‐Bustos, Penelope J. Boston, Pablo de León, Cansu Demirel‐Floyd, Jo De Waele, Heather Jones, Michael J. Malaska, Ana Z. Miller, Haley M. Sapers, Francesco Sauro, Derek L. Sonderegger, Kyle Uckert, Uland Y. Wong, E. Calvin Alexander, Leroy Chiao, Glen E. Cushing, John DeDecker, Alberto G. Fairén, Amos Frumkin, Gary L. Harris, Michelle L. Kearney, Laura Kerber, Richard J. Léveillé, Kavya Manyapu, Matteo Massironi, John E. Mylroie, Bogdan P. Onac, Scott E. Parazynski, Charity M. Phillips‐Lander, Thomas H. Prettyman, Dirk Schulze‐Makuch, Robert V. Wagner, William L. Whittaker, Kaj E. Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 5 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#225,744
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: PLANETS
#79
of 2,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,168
of 441,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: PLANETS
#5
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.