You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
広域洪水ハザードマップの比較評価と企業実務活用への提言
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3178/jjshwr.35.175 |
| Authors |
平林 由希子, 山田 果林, 山崎 大, 石川 悠生, 新井 茉莉, 犬塚 俊之, 久松 力人, 小川田 大吉 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,984,755
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES
#24
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,897
of 446,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.