↓ Skip to main content

Targeting cessation: Understanding barriers and motivations to quitting among urban adult daily tobacco smokers

Overview of attention for article published in Addictive Behaviors, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Targeting cessation: Understanding barriers and motivations to quitting among urban adult daily tobacco smokers
Published in
Addictive Behaviors, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.09.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Many people continue to smoke tobacco products despite known negative health consequences, including increased risk of chronic disease and death. Disparities exist in rates of smoking and chronic disease, underscoring the importance of understanding the barriers and motivations to smoking cessation among vulnerable populations, such as socioeconomically disadvantaged people of color.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 19%
Psychology 23 18%
Social Sciences 20 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,839,184
of 27,547,273 outputs
Outputs from Addictive Behaviors
#626
of 4,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,057
of 197,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addictive Behaviors
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,547,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.