You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lung Microbiota and Metabolites Collectively Associate with Clinical Outcomes in Milder Stage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1164/rccm.202110-2241oc |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siddharth S. Madapoosi, Charmion Cruickshank-Quinn, Kristopher Opron, John R. Erb-Downward, Lesa A. Begley, Gen Li, Igor Barjaktarevic, R. Graham Barr, Alejandro P. Comellas, David J. Couper, Christopher B. Cooper, Christine M. Freeman, MeiLan K. Han, Robert J. Kaner, Wassim Labaki, Fernando J. Martinez, Victor E. Ortega, Stephen P. Peters, Robert Paine, Prescott Woodruff, Jeffrey L. Curtis, Gary B. Huffnagle, Kathleen A. Stringer, Russell P. Bowler, Charles R. Esther, Nichole Reisdorph, Yvonne J. Huang, Neil E. Alexis, Wayne H. Anderson, Mehrdad Arjomandi, Lori A. Bateman, Surya P. Bhatt, Eugene R. Bleecker, Richard C. Boucher, Stephanie A. Christenson, Gerard J. Criner, Ronald G. Crystal, Claire M. Doerschuk, Mark T. Dransfield, Brad Drummond, Craig Galban, Nadia N. Hansel, Annette T. Hastie, Eric A. Hoffman, Richard E. Kanner, Eric C. Kleerup, Jerry A. Krishnan, Lisa M. LaVange, Stephen C. Lazarus, Deborah A. Meyers, Wendy C. Moore, John D. Newell, Laura Paulin, Cheryl Pirozzi, Nirupama Putcha, Elizabeth C. Oelsner, Wanda K. O’Neal, Sanjeev Raman, Stephen I. Rennard, Donald P. Tashkin, J. Michael Wells, Robert A. Wise |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 57% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,216,002
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#4,019
of 12,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,200
of 429,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#56
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.