↓ Skip to main content

Validation of eDNA Surveillance Sensitivity for Detection of Asian Carps in Controlled and Field Experiments

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of eDNA Surveillance Sensitivity for Detection of Asian Carps in Controlled and Field Experiments
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew R. Mahon, Christopher L. Jerde, Matthew Galaska, Jennifer L. Bergner, W. Lindsay Chadderton, David M. Lodge, Margaret E. Hunter, Leo G. Nico

Abstract

In many North American rivers, populations of multiple species of non-native cyprinid fishes are present, including black carp (Mylpharyngodon piceus), grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis), silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix), common carp (Cyprinus carpio), and goldfish (Carassius auratus). All six of these species are found in the Mississippi River basin and tracking their invasion has proven difficult, particularly where abundance is low. Knowledge of the location of the invasion front is valuable to natural resource managers because future ecological and economic damages can be most effectively prevented when populations are low. To test the accuracy of environmental DNA (eDNA) as an early indicator of species occurrence and relative abundance, we applied eDNA technology to the six non-native cyprinid species putatively present in a 2.6 river mile stretch of the Chicago (IL, USA) canal system that was subsequently treated with piscicide. The proportion of water samples yielding positive detections increased with relative abundance of the six species, as indicated by the number of carcasses recovered after poisoning. New markers for black carp, grass carp, and a common carp/goldfish are reported and details of the marker testing to ensure specificity are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 362 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 21%
Researcher 77 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 53 14%
Other 18 5%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 51 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 185 49%
Environmental Science 68 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 11%
Engineering 7 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 1%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 56 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2013.
All research outputs
#2,753,828
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#33,517
of 224,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,131
of 209,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#766
of 5,428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.