You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ImmunoChip Study Implicates Antigen Presentation to T Cells in Narcolepsy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Genetics, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juliette Faraco, Ling Lin, Birgitte Rahbek Kornum, Eimear E. Kenny, Gosia Trynka, Mali Einen, Tom J. Rico, Peter Lichtner, Yves Dauvilliers, Isabelle Arnulf, Michel Lecendreux, Sirous Javidi, Peter Geisler, Geert Mayer, Fabio Pizza, Francesca Poli, Giuseppe Plazzi, Sebastiaan Overeem, Gert Jan Lammers, David Kemlink, Karel Sonka, Sona Nevsimalova, Guy Rouleau, Alex Desautels, Jacques Montplaisir, Birgit Frauscher, Laura Ehrmann, Birgit Högl, Poul Jennum, Patrice Bourgin, Rosa Peraita-Adrados, Alex Iranzo, Claudio Bassetti, Wei-Min Chen, Patrick Concannon, Susan D. Thompson, Vincent Damotte, Bertrand Fontaine, Maxime Breban, Christian Gieger, Norman Klopp, Panos Deloukas, Cisca Wijmenga, Joachim Hallmayer, Suna Onengut-Gumuscu, Stephen S. Rich, Juliane Winkelmann, Emmanuel Mignot |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 78% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,526,993
of 27,520,826 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#4,435
of 9,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,465
of 305,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#77
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,520,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.