↓ Skip to main content

Molecular force spectroscopy with a DNA origami–based nanoscopic force clamp

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
22 X users
patent
14 patents
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Molecular force spectroscopy with a DNA origami–based nanoscopic force clamp
Published in
Science, October 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aah5974
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Forces in biological systems are typically investigated at the single-molecule level with atomic force microscopy or optical and magnetic tweezers, but these techniques suffer from limited data throughput and their requirement for a physical connection to the macroscopic world. We introduce a self-assembled nanoscopic force clamp built from DNA that operates autonomously and allows massive parallelization. Single-stranded DNA sections of an origami structure acted as entropic springs and exerted controlled tension in the low piconewton range on a molecular system, whose conformational transitions were monitored by single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer. We used the conformer switching of a Holliday junction as a benchmark and studied the TATA-binding protein-induced bending of a DNA duplex under tension. The observed suppression of bending above 10 piconewtons provides further evidence of mechanosensitivity in gene regulation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 332 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 26%
Researcher 53 16%
Student > Master 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 72 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 17%
Physics and Astronomy 55 16%
Chemistry 47 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 10%
Engineering 30 9%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 84 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2025.
All research outputs
#417,864
of 34,187,751 outputs
Outputs from Science
#10,074
of 93,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,077
of 339,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#170
of 1,159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,187,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.