↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multiple Mechanisms Switch an Electrically Coupled, Synaptically Inhibited Neuron between Competing Rhythmic Oscillators
Published in
Neuron, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rhythmic oscillations are common features of nervous systems. One of the fundamental questions posed by these rhythms is how individual neurons or groups of neurons are recruited into different network oscillations. We modeled competing fast and slow oscillators connected to a hub neuron with electrical and inhibitory synapses. We explore the patterns of coordination shown in the network as a function of the electrical coupling and inhibitory synapse strengths with the help of a novel visualization method that we call the "parameterscape." The hub neuron can be switched between the fast and slow oscillators by multiple network mechanisms, indicating that a given change in network state can be achieved by degenerate cellular mechanisms. These results have importance for interpreting experiments employing optogenetic, genetic, and pharmacological manipulations to understand circuit dynamics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 7 3%
Germany 5 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 250 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 28%
Researcher 72 26%
Student > Master 19 7%
Professor 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 30 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 35%
Neuroscience 73 27%
Physics and Astronomy 13 5%
Psychology 12 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 39 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,561,085
of 28,885,742 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#6,456
of 9,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,294
of 213,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#66
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,885,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.