You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cautious scrutiny: The Federal Climate Change Act case in the German Constitutional Court
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Modern Law Review, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2230.12746 |
| Authors |
Stefan Theil |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Colombia | 3 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Uganda | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 64% |
| Scientists | 12 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,401,679
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Modern Law Review
#33
of 745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,886
of 445,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Modern Law Review
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them