↓ Skip to main content

Early mathematics achievement of boys and girls: Do differences in early self-regulation pathways explain later achievement?

Overview of attention for article published in Learning & Individual Differences, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Early mathematics achievement of boys and girls: Do differences in early self-regulation pathways explain later achievement?
Published in
Learning & Individual Differences, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.006
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 32%
Mathematics 11 13%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Linguistics 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#10,529,969
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Individual Differences
#388
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,413
of 337,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Individual Differences
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.