↓ Skip to main content

Water table depth modulates productivity and biomass across Amazonian forests

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology & Biogeography, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Water table depth modulates productivity and biomass across Amazonian forests
Published in
Global Ecology & Biogeography, May 2022
DOI 10.1111/geb.13531
Authors

Thaiane R. Sousa, Juliana Schietti, Igor O. Ribeiro, Thaise Emílio, Rafael Herrera Fernández, Hans ter Steege, Carolina V. Castilho, Adriane Esquivel‐Muelbert, Timothy Baker, Aline Pontes‐Lopes, Camila V. J. Silva, Juliana M. Silveira, Géraldine Derroire, Wendeson Castro, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, Ademir Ruschel, Adriana Prieto, Adriano José Nogueira Lima, Agustín Rudas, Alejandro Araujo‐Murakami, Alexander Parada Gutierrez, Ana Andrade, Anand Roopsind, Angelo Gilberto Manzatto, Anthony Di Fiore, Armando Torres‐Lezama, Aurélie Dourdain, Beatriz Marimon, Ben Hur Marimon, Benoit Burban, Bert van Ulft, Bruno Herault, Carlos Quesada, Casimiro Mendoza, Clement Stahl, Damien Bonal, David Galbraith, David Neill, Edmar A. de Oliveira, Eduardo Hase, Eliana Jimenez‐Rojas, Emilio Vilanova, Eric Arets, Erika Berenguer, Esteban Alvarez‐Davila, Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado, Everton Almeida, Fernanda Coelho, Fernando Cornejo Valverde, Fernando Elias, Foster Brown, Frans Bongers, Freddy Ramirez Arevalo, Gabriela Lopez‐Gonzalez, Geertje van der Heijden, Gerardo A. Aymard C., Gerardo Flores Llampazo, Guido Pardo, Hirma Ramírez‐Angulo, Iêda Leão do Amaral, Ima Célia Guimarães Vieira, Isau Huamantupa‐Chuquimaco, James A. Comiskey, James Singh, Javier Silva Espejo, Jhon del Aguila‐Pasquel, Joeri Alexander Zwerts, Joey Talbot, John Terborgh, Joice Ferreira, Jorcely G. Barroso, Jos Barlow, José Luís Camargo, Juliana Stropp, Julie Peacock, Julio Serrano, Karina Melgaço, Leandro V. Ferreira, Lilian Blanc, Lourens Poorter, Luis Valenzuela Gamarra, Luiz Aragão, Luzmila Arroyo, Marcos Silveira, Maria Cristina Peñuela‐Mora, Mario Percy Núñez Vargas, Marisol Toledo, Mat Disney, Maxime Réjou‐Méchain, Michel Baisie, Michelle Kalamandeen, Nadir Pallqui Camacho, Nállarett Dávila Cardozo, Natalino Silva, Nigel Pitman, Niro Higuchi, Olaf Banki, Patricia Alvarez Loayza, Paulo M. L. A. Graça, Paulo S. Morandi, Peter J. van der Meer, Peter van der Hout, Pétrus Naisso, Plínio Barbosa Camargo, Rafael Salomão, Raquel Thomas, Rene Boot, Ricardo Keichi Umetsu, Richarlly da Costa Silva, Robyn Burnham, Roderick Zagt, Rodolfo Vasquez Martinez, Roel Brienen, Sabina Cerruto Ribeiro, Simon L. Lewis, Simone Aparecida Vieira, Simone Matias de Almeida Reis, Sophie Fauset, Susan Laurance, Ted Feldpausch, Terry Erwin, Timothy Killeen, Verginia Wortel, Victor Chama Moscoso, Vincent Vos, Walter Huaraca Huasco, William Laurance, Yadvinder Malhi, William E. Magnusson, Oliver L. Phillips, Flávia R. C. Costa

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Other 6 6%
Student > Master 4 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 40 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 27%
Environmental Science 20 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 46 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,068,821
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#669
of 2,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,404
of 468,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#29
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.