↓ Skip to main content

Pitching Biomechanics as a Pitcher Approaches Muscular Fatigue during a Simulated Baseball Game

Overview of attention for article published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pitching Biomechanics as a Pitcher Approaches Muscular Fatigue during a Simulated Baseball Game
Published in
The American Journal of Sports Medicine, January 2007
DOI 10.1177/0363546506293025
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The effects of approaching muscular fatigue on pitching biomechanics are currently unknown. As a pitcher fatigues, pitching mechanics may change, leading to a decrease in performance and an increased risk of injury.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Chile 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 267 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 17%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Other 20 7%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 68 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 63 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 9%
Engineering 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 81 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2026.
All research outputs
#7,137,771
of 34,156,109 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#2,720
of 6,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,951
of 227,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,156,109 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.