↓ Skip to main content

A Deep Learning Approach for Quantifying Vocal Fold Dynamics During Connected Speech Using Laryngeal High-Speed Videoendoscopy.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Deep Learning Approach for Quantifying Vocal Fold Dynamics During Connected Speech Using Laryngeal High-Speed Videoendoscopy.
Published in
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, May 2022
DOI 10.1044/2022_jslhr-21-00540
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Voice disorders are best assessed by examining vocal fold dynamics in connected speech. This can be achieved using flexible laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy (HSV), which enables us to study vocal fold mechanics with high temporal details. Analysis of vocal fold vibration using HSV requires accurate segmentation of the vocal fold edges. This article presents an automated deep-learning scheme to segment the glottal area in HSV from which the glottal edges are derived during connected speech. Using a custom-built HSV system, data were obtained from a vocally healthy participant reciting the "Rainbow Passage." A deep neural network was designed for glottal area segmentation in the HSV data. A recently introduced hybrid approach by the authors was utilized as an automated labeling tool to train the network on a set of HSV frames, where the glottis region was automatically annotated during vocal fold vibrations. The network was then tested against manually segmented frames using different metrics, intersection over union (IoU), and Boundary F1 (BF) score, and its performance was assessed on various phonatory events on the HSV sequence. The designed network was successfully trained using the hybrid approach, without the need for manual labeling, and tested on the manually labeled data. The performance metrics showed a mean IoU of 0.82 and a mean BF score of 0.96. In addition, the evaluation assessment of the network's performance demonstrated an accurate segmentation of the glottal edges/area even during complex nonstationary phonatory events and when vocal folds were not vibrating, thus overcoming the limitations of the previous hybrid approach that could only be applied to the vibrating vocal folds. The introduced automated scheme guarantees accurate glottis representation in challenging color HSV data with lower image quality and excessive laryngeal maneuvers during all instances of connected speech. This facilitates the future development of HSV-based measures to assess the running vibratory characteristics of the vocal folds in speakers with and without voice disorder. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19798864.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 21 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 23 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2022.
All research outputs
#24,108,758
of 34,386,255 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
#3,191
of 4,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,326
of 469,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
#35
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,386,255 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.