↓ Skip to main content

Failure of antivenom to improve recovery in Australian snakebite coagulopathy

Overview of attention for article published in QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 3,108)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
95 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Failure of antivenom to improve recovery in Australian snakebite coagulopathy
Published in
QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, July 2009
DOI 10.1093/qjmed/hcp081
Pubmed ID
Authors

G.K. Isbister, S.B. Duffull, S.G.A. Brown, for the ASP Investigators

Abstract

Venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC) is an important feature of snake envenoming.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 11%
Other 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 753. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2024.
All research outputs
#33,032
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
#4
of 3,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47
of 173,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.