↓ Skip to main content

Sociocultural Factors, Access to Healthcare, and Lifestyle: Multifactorial Indicators in Association with Colorectal Cancer Risk.

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Prevention Research, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sociocultural Factors, Access to Healthcare, and Lifestyle: Multifactorial Indicators in Association with Colorectal Cancer Risk.
Published in
Cancer Prevention Research, May 2022
DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaneda Warren Andersen, Wei Zheng, Mark Steinwandel, Harvey J Murff, Loren Lipworth, William J Blot

Abstract

Black Americans of low SES have higher colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence than other groups in the US. However, much of the research that identifies CRC risk factors is conducted in cohorts of high SES and non-Hispanic white participants. Adults participants of the Southern Community Cohort Study (N=75,182) were followed for a median of 12.25 years where 742 incident CRCs were identified. The majority of the cohort are non-Hispanic white or Black and have low household income. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for CRC incidence associated with sociocultural factors, access to and use of healthcare, and healthy lifestyle scores to represent healthy eating, alcohol intake, smoking and physical activity. The association between Black race and CRC was consistent and not diminished by accounting for SES, access to healthcare or healthy lifestyle (HR=1.34; 95%CI:1.10,1.63). CRC screening was a strong, risk reduction factor for CRC (HR=0.65; 95%CI:0.55,0.78), and among CRC-screened, Black race was not associated with risk. Participants with >= high school education were at lower CRC risk (HR=0.81; 95%CI:0.67,0.98). Income and neighborhood-level SES were not strongly associated with CRC risk. Whereas individual health behaviors were not associated with risk, participants that reported adhering to >=3 health behaviors had a 19% (95%CI:1%,34%) decreased CRC risk compared to participants that reported =<1 behaviors. The association was consistent in fully-adjusted models, although HRs were no longer significant. CRC screening, education, and a lifestyle that includes healthy behaviors lowers CRC risk. Racial disparities in CRC risk may be diminished by CRC screening.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 20%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,244,480
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Prevention Research
#398
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,699
of 441,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Prevention Research
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.