↓ Skip to main content

Self-selection vs Randomized Assignment of Treatment for Appendicitis

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Surgery, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Self-selection vs Randomized Assignment of Treatment for Appendicitis
Published in
JAMA Surgery, July 2022
DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1554
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles Parsons, Nathan I. Shapiro, Randall Cooper, Aleksandr Tichter, Ross Fleischman, Erin C. Howell, Dennis Kim, Brant Putnam, Lara H. Spence, Hikmatullah Arif, Farhood Farjah, Laura Hennessey, Kelsey Pullar, Erika Wolff, Lillian Adrianna Hayes, Alyssa Hayward, Joe H. Patton, Vance Sohn, Debra Burris, Damien Carter, Bruce Chung, Terilee Gerry, Joseph Mack, David MacKenzie, Hasan Alam, Nathan Haas, Cindy Hsu, Norman Olbrich, Pauline Park, Krishnan Raghavendran, Robert Bennion, Formosa Chen, Debbie Mireles, Gregory Moran, Kavitha Pathmarajah, Darin Saltzman, Lisandra Uribe, Paul J Schmit, Bruce Wolfe, Kimberly Deeney, Mary Guiden, Miriam Hernandez, Elliott Skopin, Heather VanDusen, Meridith Weiss, Careen Foster, Shaina Schaetzel, Brandon Tudor, Arden Morris, Ryan Martinez, Dayna Morgan, John Tschirhart, Julie Wallick, Sean Wells, Amy Rushing, Steven Steinberg, Mohamad Abouzeid, William Chiang, Jason Maggi, Marcovalerio Melis, Kristyn Pierce, Paresh Shah, Prashant Sinha, Brett Faine, Cathy Fairfield, Dionne Skeete, Deepti Patki, Rebekah K. Peacock, Donald M. Yealy, Karla Bernardi, Naila Dhanani, Tien C. Ko, Debbie Lew, Stephanie Marquez, Oscar Olavarria, Karen Horvath, Daniel Kim, Zoe Parr, Estel Williams, Karen F. Miller, Kelly M. Moser, Scott Osborn, Abigail Wiebusch, Julianna Yu, Karla Ballman, Sunday Clark, Billie Johnsson, Lauren Mount, Thomas Diflo, Kathleen O’Connor, Olga Owens, Giana H. Davidson, Sarah E. Monsell, Heather Evans, Emily C. Voldal, Erin Fannon, Sarah O. Lawrence, Anusha Krishnadasan, David A. Talan, Bonnie Bizzell, Patrick J. Heagerty, Bryan A. Comstock, Danielle C. Lavallee, Cassandra Villegas, Robert Winchell, Callie M. Thompson, Wesley H. Self, Lillian S. Kao, Shah-Jahan Dodwad, Amber K. Sabbatini, David Droullard, David Machado-Aranda, Melinda Maggard Gibbons, Amy H. Kaji, Daniel A. DeUgarte, Lisa Ferrigno, Matthew Salzberg, Katherine A. Mandell, Nicole Siparsky, Thea P. Price, Anooradha Raman, Joshua Corsa, Jon Wisler, Patricia Ayoung-Chee, Jesse Victory, Alan Jones, Matthew Kutcher, Karen McGrane, Julie Holihan, Mike K. Liang, Joseph Cuschieri, Jeffrey Johnson, Katherine Fischkoff, F. Thurston Drake, Sabrina E. Sanchez, Stephen R. Odom, Larry G. Kessler, David R. Flum

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 7%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 24 55%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 24 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,347,433
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#2,001
of 5,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,330
of 438,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#46
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.