↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive behavioral therapy for PTSD and somatization: An open trial

Overview of attention for article published in Behaviour Research & Therapy, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cognitive behavioral therapy for PTSD and somatization: An open trial
Published in
Behaviour Research & Therapy, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2013.02.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos I. Pérez Benítez, Caron Zlotnick, Judelysse Gomez, Maria J. Rendón, Amelia Swanson

Abstract

No treatment, to date, has been developed to improve both posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS), despite mounting evidence of high comorbidity between PTSD and MUPS. This study assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and treatment outcomes of an adapted cognitive behavioral therapy for PTSD and abridged somatization in a sample of eight participants. Fifteen percent of completers did not meet PTSD criteria after treatment completion and 62.5% improved their somatic symptoms. There was a significant difference between pre- and post-treatment depression symptoms, as well as in psychological and physical functioning measures. Results indicated a small to moderate effect size (d = 0.27-0.78) in PTSD severity scores, and moderate to large effect size in depression symptoms and psychosocial and physical functioning variables (d = 0.39-1.12). Preliminary evidence of acceptability indicates that the current CBT intervention may be suitable for Latinos individuals with PTSD and MUPS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 49%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#10,329,559
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#1,725
of 3,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,501
of 241,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#17
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.