↓ Skip to main content

International Spinal Cord Injury Pain (ISCIP) Classification: Part 2. Initial validation using vignettes

Overview of attention for article published in Spinal Cord, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
International Spinal Cord Injury Pain (ISCIP) Classification: Part 2. Initial validation using vignettes
Published in
Spinal Cord, February 2012
DOI 10.1038/sc.2012.2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 20 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 24%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 26 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,549,268
of 32,375,021 outputs
Outputs from Spinal Cord
#173
of 2,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,296
of 296,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spinal Cord
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,375,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.