You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
財政規律の誤謬:数理分析によるMMTの精神
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MACRO REVIEW, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.11286/jmr.34.1 |
| Authors |
田中 靖人 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 22% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Nepal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,313,847
of 25,473,687 outputs
Outputs from MACRO REVIEW
#1
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,593
of 448,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MACRO REVIEW
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,473,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them