You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Crop breeding for a changing climate in the Pannonian region: towards integration of modern phenotyping tools.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Botany, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jxb/erac181 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ankica Kondić-Špika, Sanja Mikić, Milan Mirosavljević, Dragana Trkulja, Ana Marjanović Jeromela, Dragana Rajković, Aleksandra Radanović, Sandra Cvejić, Svetlana Glogovac, Dejan Dodig, Sofija Božinović, Zlatko Šatović, Boris Lazarević, Domagoj Šimić, Dario Novoselović, Imre Vass, János Pauk, Dragana Miladinović |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,209,684
of 24,469,913 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Botany
#4,436
of 7,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,850
of 432,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Botany
#106
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,469,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.