↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Optimizing sensory fiber activation during cervical transcutaneous spinal stimulation using different electrode configurations: A computational analysis
Published in
Artificial Organs, June 2022
DOI 10.1111/aor.14323
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a rehabilitation tool which has been used to promote upper-limb motor recovery after spinal cord injury. Importantly, optimizing sensory fiber activation at specific spinal segments could enable activity-dependent neuromodulation during rehabilitation. An anatomically realistic cervical tSCS computational model was used to analyze the activation of α-motor and Aα-sensory fibers at C7 and C8 spinal segments using nine cathode electrode configurations. Specifically, the cathode was simulated at three vertebral level positions: C6, C7, and T1; and in three sizes: 5.0 x 5.0, 3.5 x 3.5; and 2.5 x 2.5 cm2 , while the anode was on the anterior neck. Finite element method was used to estimate the electric potential distribution along α-motor and Aα-sensory fibers, and computational models were applied to simulate the fiber membrane dynamics during tSCS. The minimum stimulation intensity necessary to activate the fibers (activation threshold) was estimated and compared across cathode configurations in an effort to optimize sensory fiber activation. Our results showed that nerve fibers at both C7 and C8 spinal segments were recruited at lower stimulation intensities when the cathode was positioned over the C7 or T1 vertebra compared with the C6 position. Sensory fibers were activated at lower stimulation intensities using smaller electrodes, which could also affect the degree of nerve fiber activation across different positions. Importantly, Aα-sensory fibers were consistently recruited before α-motor fibers. These results imply that cathode positioning could help optimize preferential activation of hand muscles during cervical tSCS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 26%
Neuroscience 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,446,479
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Artificial Organs
#322
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,006
of 445,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Artificial Organs
#18
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.