You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health Effects of Asian Dust Events: A Review of the Literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1265/jjh.65.413 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masahiro HASHIZUME, Kayo UEDA, Yuji NISHIWAKI, Takehiro MICHIKAWA, Daisuke ONOZUKA |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene
#34
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,270
of 172,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them