↓ Skip to main content

魚類透明骨格標本作製の安全性向上に向けた透徹方法の検討

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Research in Science Education, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
魚類透明骨格標本作製の安全性向上に向けた透徹方法の検討
Published in
Journal of Research in Science Education, March 2022
DOI 10.11639/sjst.21050
Authors

西川 洋史

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#14,553,484
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Research in Science Education
#27
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,014
of 433,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Research in Science Education
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them