↓ Skip to main content

外科治療が有効であったMarine-Lenhart 症候群の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
外科治療が有効であったMarine-Lenhart 症候群の1例
Published in
Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery, January 2013
DOI 10.11226/jaesjsts.29.1_76
Authors

黒住 献, 松本 広志, 大矢 敏裕, 多胡 賢一, 室谷 研, 内田 紗弥香, 尾林 海, 家里 裕, 横森 忠紘, 堀口 淳, 竹吉 泉, 長谷川 剛

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#111
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,208
of 293,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Official Journal of the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgery
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.