| Title |
Non-speculum clinician-taken samples for HPV testing: a cross sectional study in older women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0708 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Landy, Tony Hollingworth, Jo Waller, Laura Av Marlow, Jane Rigney, Thomas Round, Peter D Sasieni, Anita Ww Lim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 63% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,364,514
of 23,861,036 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#674
of 4,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,827
of 431,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#19
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,861,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.