You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
沖縄島金武湾から得られたTaenioides kentalleniティーダチワラスボ(新称)の記録
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.34583/ichthy.21.0_1 |
| Authors |
上田 龍之介, 佐藤 大義, 小林 大純 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,843,348
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#75
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,984
of 450,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.